A six-step policy loop starts with results arriving without a follow-up slot, compares scheduling, reserved follow-up and added capacity, then requires separate patient and service-expertise chamber decisions. Failed passage returns to the proposal. Evaluation and rights review precede an independently granted activation, followed by monitored revision. An explicitly separate CP-01 inset shows equal patient votes and clinician weights of three, two and one, preserving two-principal quorum and distinct support thresholds.
